Which of the following must be included in the summary of facts for an appeal?

In the context of an appeal, the summary of facts is crucial as it sets the stage for the court to understand the case at hand. Including details about interviews with the police in this summary is important because it illustrates the procedural aspects of the case and how evidence was gathered. This information can impact how the appeal court perceives the legitimacy of the evidence and the overall trial process.

The inclusion of interview details can also highlight any potential issues regarding the police conduct or the fairness of the proceedings. Therefore, presenting this information is essential for the court to evaluate the merits of the appeal effectively.

While other elements may hold relevance in various contexts, details such as the name of the judge, the sentencing guidelines, or evidence from third parties typically do not provide as substantive a contribution to the factual summary required in an appeal. Each of these elements may individually contribute to the broader understanding of the case but aren't as pivotal in establishing the facts related to the appeal process itself.