What must be articulated in the summary of grounds for an appeal?

The requirement for the summary of grounds for an appeal to articulate errors made by the judge is crucial because the appeal process is fundamentally about challenging the decisions made in the original trial. An appeal is not a re-trial but a review of the legal proceedings that occurred in the lower court. Therefore, clearly stating the specific errors—whether they relate to the application of the law, misinterpretation of evidence, procedural irregularities, or other significant mistakes—is necessary to demonstrate why the original ruling should be reconsidered.

This articulation serves to inform the appellate court of the precise legal objections being raised, which allows the court to evaluate whether those errors warrant a reversal or alteration of the original decision. The identification of errors is the foundation upon which the appeal is built, as it focuses the appellate court’s attention on the alleged injustices of the initial verdict and helps establish grounds for overturning or modifying the court's decision.