What does 'remoteness of damage' refer to in tort law?

In tort law, 'remoteness of damage' pertains primarily to the principle of foreseeability and its effect on liability for damages resulting from a wrongful act. The concept establishes that a defendant is only liable for those damages that are a foreseeable consequence of their actions. This means that if the consequences of a defendant's conduct can be reasonably predicted to occur, they may be held accountable for those damages.

By focusing on the foreseeability of damage, the law seeks to limit the scope of liability, ensuring that individuals are only responsible for harm that is a direct and foreseeable result of their actions. This helps prevent an undue burden on defendants, who should not be liable for unexpected or extraordinary consequences that could not have been anticipated.

The other choices here do not align with the established legal principle of remoteness of damage. Liability for all damages, regardless of foreseeability, would lead to excessive and unpredictable liability. Full liability for all unintentional injuries or strict liability in all tort cases does not accurately represent the nuances of tort law, which allows for some defenses based on the foreseeability of harm. Therefore, the correct understanding of remoteness of damage is encapsulated well in the notion of limiting liability to those results that are foreseeable from a defendant